Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:40 pm
by xgary

PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:38 am
by gdewsbury
That certainly looks nicer than getting 2 strokes running and keeping them going!!!

PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:20 am
by yankeflyer
Hope he takes trade inns. Its sounds like a turbo prop very cool. The plane reminds me of some other ultralights from the 80`s and 90`s.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:38 pm
by xgary
Nothing wrong with 2 strokes.

I have logged thousands of hours behind them and really not sure how they get the bad rap ?

Must be the owners doing something or their ignorance to simple engines,

Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
Flying Videos and Kitfox Info
http://www.cfisher.com/
Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer

PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:45 am
by yankeflyer
The numbers claimed for this engine are very impressive. The possibilitys seem to grow with every new generation of electric motors.

Not knocking two strokes - had some great times with my 477 rotax.

http://www.isis-innovation.com/licensing/3056.html