Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 3:36 amHey guys I was doing a top-end overhaul on my Rotax's and noticed something that I haven't read or heard about yet. Maybe this is common knowledge to the more experienced guys, but for those of you like me who are learning about your engines, this might be helpful:
I needed to replace my rings to get my compression back up. I opened up the Wajax manual and got the part numbers for the rings. While I was at it I decided to replace all the gaskets as well since a few were starting to leak. The manual shows two different rings. An "L" shaped ring (part #R-331-1) for the top only and a "standard" shaped ring (part#R-331) for the bottom.
At the time I ordered, I hadn't pulled the rings off the piston. When I did, I noticed that the top and the bottom rings on my engines were identical. I find that interesting since that special "L" shaped top ring cost me 40 bucks and the lower "standard" ring cost me 8. So what is up with these 40 dollar rings? Couldn't I have saved some money if the engine runs great with a set of "standard" rings?!!
I called up Wildfire and asked for Charles. He rebuilds the pump version of the Rotax 185. I asked him what the "L" shaped ring is designed to do and why my engines don't have them. He said that the "L" shaped top ring is an upgrade and is designed to carry oil better to decrease wear and maintain compression. The reason my engines don't have them is because that is the way the factory makes the engines. They put two "standard" rings in there to save money. The "L" ring is basically a factory upgrade.
I am currently seating my rings now. Hopefully all this work will pay off in higher compression and some higher RPM's. Last year my engines ran great, but one engine was a little weaker than the other and as such I had to settle for reduced power since I had to sync them.
MarkDJ.
I needed to replace my rings to get my compression back up. I opened up the Wajax manual and got the part numbers for the rings. While I was at it I decided to replace all the gaskets as well since a few were starting to leak. The manual shows two different rings. An "L" shaped ring (part #R-331-1) for the top only and a "standard" shaped ring (part#R-331) for the bottom.
At the time I ordered, I hadn't pulled the rings off the piston. When I did, I noticed that the top and the bottom rings on my engines were identical. I find that interesting since that special "L" shaped top ring cost me 40 bucks and the lower "standard" ring cost me 8. So what is up with these 40 dollar rings? Couldn't I have saved some money if the engine runs great with a set of "standard" rings?!!
I called up Wildfire and asked for Charles. He rebuilds the pump version of the Rotax 185. I asked him what the "L" shaped ring is designed to do and why my engines don't have them. He said that the "L" shaped top ring is an upgrade and is designed to carry oil better to decrease wear and maintain compression. The reason my engines don't have them is because that is the way the factory makes the engines. They put two "standard" rings in there to save money. The "L" ring is basically a factory upgrade.
I am currently seating my rings now. Hopefully all this work will pay off in higher compression and some higher RPM's. Last year my engines ran great, but one engine was a little weaker than the other and as such I had to settle for reduced power since I had to sync them.
MarkDJ.